Cullum

Court of Claims

Cullum

145 Ct. Cl. 748, 1959 WL 1433

United States Court of Claims·Decided May 13, 1959·No. No. 451-58·Published

Opinion

Soil Bank payments. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, together with oral argument by counsel, it was ordered that defendant’s motion be granted and plaintiff’s petition dismissed, the court being of the opinion that the action of the A.S.C. Committee was in effect a termination of the agreement, and that consequently this court lacks jurisdiction, Soil Bank Act, 7 U.S.C. (1958) § 1821(a) (i).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Soil Bank payments. Upon consideration of defendant’s motion for summary judgment, together with oral argument by counsel, it was ordered that defendant’s motion be granted and plaintiff’s petition dismissed, the court being of the opinion that the action of the A.S.C. Committee was in effect a termination of the agreement, and that consequently this court lacks jurisdiction, Soil Bank Act, 7 U.S.C. (1958) § 1821(a) (i).

Cullum, 145 Ct. Cl. 748, 1959 WL 1433 (cc 1959).

Pincite

145 Ct. Cl. 748 (Cullum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.