Cullom v. Kadel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cullom v. Kadel

283 A.D. 964, 130 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5927

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 17, 1954

StatusPublished

This text of 283 A.D. 964 (Cullom v. Kadel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cullom v. Kadel, 283 A.D. 964, 130 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5927 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

—In three actions based on slander and libels, Special Term denied appellants’ motion to consolidate or, in the alternative, to try the actions together, and granted a motion for reargnment, but on reargument adhered to the original decision. The appeal is from the original order and from so much of the order on reargument as adheres to the original decision. Order on reargument, insofar as appeal is taken, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under all the facts and circumstances, it may not be said that the Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In three actions based on slander and libels, Special Term denied appellants’ motion to consolidate or, in the alternative, to try the actions together, and granted a motion for reargnment, but on reargument adhered to the original decision. The appeal is from the original order and from so much of the order on reargument as adheres to the original decision. Order on reargument, insofar as appeal is taken, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Under all the facts and circumstances, it may not be said that the Special Term improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the motion. Appeal from original order dismissed, without costs. Adel, Acting P. J., Wenzel, MaeCrate, Beldoek and Murphy, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

283 A.D. 964, 130 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1954 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullom-v-kadel-nyappdiv-1954.