Cullman v. Colell
23 Jones & S. 571
This text of 23 Jones & S. 571 (Cullman v. Colell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cullman v. Colell, 23 Jones & S. 571 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1888).
Opinion
All the exceptions taken by the defendant during trial appear to be untenable. To the findings made by the referee, and his refusals to find, the defendant took but a single exception. It was to the conclusion of the referee from the facts found by him. The conclusion was correct. Judgment affirmed with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
23 Jones & S. 571, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullman-v-colell-nysuperctnyc-1888.