Cullinan v. Stein

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 26, 1902·Published

Opinion

Keener, J.:

The contention that the liability on the bond is discharged by a cancellation of the certificate is not well taken. (Lyman v. Cheever, 168 N. Y. 43, 46-47.) The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the verdict.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cullinan v. Stein, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55 (Cullinan v. Stein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lyman v. . Cheever
60 N.E. 1047 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)