Cullinan v. Stein
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55
This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55 (Cullinan v. Stein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cullinan v. Stein, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).
Opinion
The contention that the liability on the bond is discharged by a cancellation of the certificate is not well taken. (Lyman v. Cheever, 168 N. Y. 43, 46-47.) The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lyman v. . Cheever
60 N.E. 1047 (New York Court of Appeals, 1901)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullinan-v-stein-nysupct-1902.