Cullinan v. Reich

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 347

Opinion

The correctness of the watches of plaintiff’s witnesses was established by comparison with standard New York city time as used at police headquarters and regulated at Tiffany’s.

The denials as to sales between twelve and one o’clock a. m. Sundays were so indefinite as to raise ho issue for the jury, or require the submission of the question as to credibility of plaintiff’s witnesses. (Culhane v. City, 60 N. Y. 133; Same v. Same, 67 Barb. 562; Tolman v. Syracuse, 27 Hun, 325; Taylor v. Ry. Co. 16 App. Div. 1.)

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cullinan v. Reich, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 347 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 347 (Cullinan v. Reich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Culhane v. . N.Y. Cen. H.R.R.R. Co.
60 N.Y. 133 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
Taylor v. Long Island Railroad
16 A.D. 1 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Culhane v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
67 Barb. 562 (New York Supreme Court, 1876)