Cullinan v. Kuch
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56
Opinion
The contention that the bond is void because of a non-compliance with the Liquor Tax Law is not well taken. (Lyman v. Brucker, 26 Misc. 594; 42 App. Div. 624.) The plaintiff is entitled to judgment on the verdict.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cullinan v. Kuch, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1902).
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 56 (Cullinan v. Kuch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lyman v. Brucker
26 Misc. 594 (New York Supreme Court, 1899)