Cullinan v. Ano

3 Liquor Tax Rep. 237
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 24, 1903
StatusPublished

This text of 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 237 (Cullinan v. Ano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cullinan v. Ano, 3 Liquor Tax Rep. 237 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1903).

Opinion

Leventritt, J.

The sixth paragraph of the complaint is not irrelevant, immaterial or redundant. It cannot be stricken out. The defendant has mistaken her remedy. She should seek relief by a bill of particulars specifying in what respects, at what times and upon what occasions the premises were suffered to be and became disorderly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Liquor Tax Rep. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullinan-v-ano-nysupct-1903.