Culligan v. Martin

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Culligan v. Martin

267 So. 2d 208, 263 La. 98, 1972 La. LEXIS 5314

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedOctober 17, 1972

DocketNo. 52898

StatusPublished

This text of 267 So. 2d 208 (Culligan v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Culligan v. Martin, 267 So. 2d 208, 263 La. 98, 1972 La. LEXIS 5314 (La. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

Writ refused. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction when due to the element of time, any judgment which [100]*100might be rendered could not become effective to afford relator the relief sought.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the time element does not prevent the consideration of the issues; ballots have not been printed, except for absentee ballots. Downs v. Pharis, 240 La. 580, 124 So.2d 553, is probably in error, and, if so, should be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Writ refused. This Court will not exercise its supervisory jurisdiction when due to the element of time, any judgment which [100]*100might be rendered could not become effective to afford relator the relief sought.

DIXON, J.,

is of the opinion that the time element does not prevent the consideration of the issues; ballots have not been printed, except for absentee ballots. Downs v. Pharis, 240 La. 580, 124 So.2d 553, is probably in error, and, if so, should be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 So. 2d 208, 263 La. 98, 1972 La. LEXIS 5314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culligan-v-martin-la-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack