Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

999 N.E.2d 698, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1444
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 24, 2013
Docket2012-0535
StatusPublished

This text of 999 N.E.2d 698 (Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins., 999 N.E.2d 698, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1444 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 95925, 2011-Ohio-6621.

On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.

Pfeifer, J., dissents. Matthew W. McFarland, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for French, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cullen v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
2011 Ohio 6621 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
999 N.E.2d 698, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-v-state-farm-mut-auto-ins-ohio-2013.