Cullen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

CourtUnited States Court of Federal Claims
DecidedApril 30, 2024
Docket21-1673V
StatusUnpublished

This text of Cullen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Cullen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Federal Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cullen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2024).

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 21-1673V

SHEILA CULLEN, Chief Special Master Corcoran

Petitioner, Filed: March 21, 2024 v.

SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

Leah VaSahnja Durant, Law Offices of Leah V. Durant, PLLC, Washington, DC, for Petitioner.

Tyler King, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On August 9, 2021, Sheila Cullen filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq. 2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Table injury – a shoulder injury related to vaccine administration (“SIRVA”), as a result of her receipt of a tetanus (“Tdap”) vaccination on November 18, 2020. Petition at 1. Petitioner further alleges the vaccine was administered within the United States, that she suffered the residual effects of her injury for more than six months, and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action on her behalf as a result of her injury. See Amended Petition, filed January 6, 2023, at 1, ¶¶ 13-14; Stipulation, filed March 19, 2024, at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner’s alleged shoulder injury, and further denies that the Tdap vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from any other injury or her current condition.” Stipulation at ¶ 6. 1 Because this Decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action taken in this case, it must be made publicly accessible and will be posted on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, and/or at https://www.govinfo.gov/app/collection/uscourts/national/cofc, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2018) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the Decision will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all section references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2018). Nevertheless, on March 19, 2024, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

A lump sum of $10,000.00 in the form of a check payable to Petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under Section 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision. 3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

SHEILA CULLEN, No. 2l-1673V Petitioner, Chief Special Master Corcoran ECF V.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Petitioner, Sheila Cullen, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of the tetanus ("Tdap") vaccine, which is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"). 42

C.F.R. § I00.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the Tdap vaccine on November 18, 2020.

3. The vaccine was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she sustained a shoulder injury related to vaccine

administration ("SIRVA") within the time period set forth in the table, or in the alternative, that

her alleged shoulder injury was caused by the vaccine. Petitioner further alleges that she

experienced the residual effects of this condition for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that petitioner sustained a SIRVA Table injury; denies that the

Tdap vaccine caused petitioner's alleged shoulder injury, and further denies that the Tdap

vaccine caused petitioner to suffer from any other injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent

with the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioner has filed an election to receive

compensation pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I), the Secretary of Health and Human

Services will issue the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of$10,000.00 in the fonn of a check payable to petitioner. This amount represents compensation for alJ damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofjudgment on entitlement in this case, and

after petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensation pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 l(a)( I), and an application, the parties will submit to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitioner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any items or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa- I 5(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq.)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 and any amounts awarded pursuant to

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(I)
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
§ 300aa-l5
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(i)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cullen v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-v-secretary-of-health-and-human-services-uscfc-2024.