Cullen v. Holz
161 N.E.2d 392, 6 N.Y.2d 971, 191 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1232
This text of 161 N.E.2d 392 (Cullen v. Holz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cullen v. Holz, 161 N.E.2d 392, 6 N.Y.2d 971, 191 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1232 (N.Y. 1959).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
161 N.E.2d 392, 6 N.Y.2d 971, 191 N.Y.S.2d 167, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1232, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-v-holz-ny-1959.