Cullen v. Currier
This text of Cullen v. Currier (Cullen v. Currier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000450 27-APR-2015 09:18 AM
SCWC-12-0000450
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI'I
PAUL K. CULLEN aka PAUL KAUKA NAKI,
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant,
vs.
LAVINIA CURRIER and PUU O HOKU RANCH, LTD.,
Respondents/Defendants-Appellees.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS
(CAAP-12-0000450; DC-CIVIL NO. 11-1-3105)
ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Plaintiff-Appellant Paul K. Cullen aka Paul Kauka Naki’s application for writ of certiorari filed March 27, 2015, was filed more than thirty days after the filing of the ICA’s January 5, 2015, judgment on appeal. The application is untimely, and thus, this court lacks appellate jurisdiction. See Hawai'i Revised Statutes § 602-59(c) (Supp. 2011); Hawai'i Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40.1(a)(1). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application for writ
of certiorari is dismissed.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai'i, April 27, 2015.
Paul K. Cullen aka /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
Paul Kauka Naki,
petitioner pro se /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cullen v. Currier, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-v-currier-haw-2015.