Home/Supreme Court/Cullen v. Bohlinger

Cullen v. Bohlinger

350 U.S. 803, 76 S. Ct. 56, 100 L. Ed. 722, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 345
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 10, 1955
DocketNo. 121
StatusPublished

This text of 350 U.S. 803 (Cullen v. Bohlinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cullen v. Bohlinger, 350 U.S. 803, 76 S. Ct. 56, 100 L. Ed. 722, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 345 (1955).

Opinion

Appeal from the Court of Appeals of New York and the [804]*804Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Samuel A. Berger for appellants. Jacob K. Javits, Attorney General, James O. Moore, Jr., Solicitor General, and Samuel A. Hirshowitz and Daniel M. Cohen, Assistant Attorneys General, for the Superintendent of Insurance of New York, and Ralph M. Carson and W. Perry Epes for the Insurance Company of North America et al., appellees.

Per Curiam:

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
350 U.S. 803, 76 S. Ct. 56, 100 L. Ed. 722, 1955 U.S. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-v-bohlinger-scotus-1955.