Cullen v. Bank One Corp.

117 F. App'x 618
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Cullen v. Bank One Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 145 F. App'x 192
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 27, 2004·No. No. 03-55347; D.C. No. CV-02-00760-RMB/CGA·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Michael Cullen appeals the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of his Truth-in-Lending-Act (TILA) claim against Bank One. Cullen alleges that the action violated the automatic stay of bankruptcy and that the bankruptcy filing deprived the district court of jurisdiction pursuant to local rules. Holding that Cullen lacked standing, we affirm the dismissal.

In the days before the district court was to rule on his amended complaint, Cullen filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy protection. Upon the filing of his bankruptcy petition, Cullen’s pending lawsuit became estate property as a potential asset. Dunmore v. U.S. (In re Dunmore), 358 F.3d 1107 (9th Cir.2004). The debtor therefore lacked standing to continue as plaintiff. Turner v. Cook, 362 F.3d 1219, 1225-26 (9th Cir. 2004).

Holding that Cullen lacked standing to appeal the district court’s ruling to this court, we dismiss the appeal.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cullen v. Bank One Corp., 117 F. App'x 618 (9th Cir. 2004).

117 F. App'x 618 (Cullen v. Bank One Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Cook
362 F.3d 1219 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)