Cullen v. Armstrong

220 F. 1006, 135 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2550
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 1915
DocketNo. 1301
StatusPublished

This text of 220 F. 1006 (Cullen v. Armstrong) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cullen v. Armstrong, 220 F. 1006, 135 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2550 (4th Cir. 1915).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decree appealed from is affirmed for the reasons stated in the opinion of the District Judge, reported in 209 Fed. 704. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cullen v. Armstrong
209 F. 704 (D. Maryland, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
220 F. 1006, 135 C.C.A. 665, 1915 U.S. App. LEXIS 2550, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-v-armstrong-ca4-1915.