Cullen Christopher Bennert v. the State of Texas
This text of Cullen Christopher Bennert v. the State of Texas (Cullen Christopher Bennert v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-25-00073-CR
CULLEN CHRISTOPHER BENNERT, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 320th District Court Potter County, Texas Trial Court No. 080106-D-CR, Honorable Pamela C. Sirmon, Presiding
March 10, 2025 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before QUINN, C.J., and PARKER and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Cullen Christopher Bennert, proceeding pro se, appeals from the trial
court’s order placing him on deferred adjudication community supervision for seven years
for the offense of aggravated assault.1 We dismiss the untimely appeal for want of
jurisdiction and because Appellant has no right of appeal.
1 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.02(a)(2). The timely filing of a written notice of appeal is a jurisdictional prerequisite to
hearing an appeal. Castillo v. State, 369 S.W.3d 196, 198 (Tex. Crim. App. 2012). In
criminal cases, a notice of appeal must be filed within thirty days after sentence is
imposed or suspended in open court, or within thirty days after the trial court enters an
appealable order. TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). This deadline is extended to ninety days if the
defendant timely files a motion for new trial. Id. If the notice of appeal is not timely filed,
an appellate court has no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. Castillo,
369 S.W.3d at 198.
The trial court signed the order of deferred adjudication on November 10, 2021.
Because no motion for new trial was filed, a notice of appeal was due within thirty days
after sentencing, by December 10, 2021. See TEX. R. APP. P. 26.2(a). Appellant filed a
notice of appeal on February 5, 2025. Appellant’s untimely notice of appeal, thus,
prevents this Court from acquiring jurisdiction over the appeal.
Further, under Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d), we are required to dismiss an
appeal “if a certification that shows the defendant has the right of appeal has not been
made part of the record.” Here, the trial court’s certification of Appellant’s right of appeal
indicates that this is a plea-bargain case with no right of appeal and that Appellant has
waived the right of appeal. The certification comports with the record before the Court.
By letter of February 7, 2025, we notified Appellant of the consequences of his late
notice of appeal and the trial court’s certification and directed him to show how the Court
has jurisdiction over the appeal by February 21. Appellant has not filed a response or
had any further communication with this Court to date.
2 Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and based on the trial
court’s certification.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cullen Christopher Bennert v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullen-christopher-bennert-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.