Cullars v. Moore
This text of Cullars v. Moore (Cullars v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
AUGUSTA DIVISION
ROBERT CULLARS, III, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CV 125-020 ) MARK MOORE, Sheriff, ) ) Defendant. )
MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
Plaintiff commenced the above-captioned civil rights case pro se concerning events alleged to have occurred Wilkes County, Georgia, and he requested permission to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). On January 30, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s IFP request, subject to returning his Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement and Consent to Collection of Fees forms within thirty days and advised Plaintiff all prisoners, even those proceeding IFP, must pay the filing fee of $350.00 in full. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Plaintiff was cautioned failure to respond would be an election to have this case voluntarily dismissed without prejudice. (See doc. no. 4.) The Clerk of Court served Plaintiff with the Court’s Order at his place of incarceration when he commenced the case, Bacon Probation Detention Center. (See Jan. 30, 2025 doc. entry.) When Plaintiff submitted a letter explaining he transferred to Calhoun State Prison, the Court directed the Clerk to serve Plaintiff at his new address with another copy of the Court’s January 30th Order and attachments. (See doc. nos. 5, 6.) The Court also granted an extension of the deadline to return the required paperwork through and including March 26, 2025. (Doc. no. 6.) The extended time to respond has passed, and Plaintiff has not submitted the documents required by the Court’s January 30th Order. Although Plaintiff returned the Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, (doc. no. 7), he did not return the Consent to Collection of Fees form. Nor has he provided the Court with any explanation to excuse his failure to comply with the Court’s Order that he return both forms. Plaintiff cannot proceed IFP unless he submits the requisite Trust Fund Account Statement and consents to collection of the entire $350.00 filing fee in installments. Wilson Sargent, 313 F.3d 1315, 1319, 1321 (11th Cir. 2002) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915). Plaintiff has been warned that failing to return the necessary IFP papers would be an election to have his case voluntarily dismissed. As Plaintiff has neither fulfilled the requirements for proceeding IFP, nor paid the full filing fee, the Court REPORTS and RECOMMENDS this case be DISMISSED without prejudice and this civil action be CLOSED. SO REPORTED and RECOMMENDED this 3rd day of April, 2025, at Augusta, Georgia. fh. k bo BRIAN K ERPS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cullars v. Moore, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cullars-v-moore-gasd-2025.