Culbreath v. State

296 S.E.2d 364, 163 Ga. App. 878, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2697
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1982·No. 64613·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Chief Judge.

The defendant brings this appeal from the revocation of his probated sentence. Held:

The revocation order contained four grounds as the bases for revoking the defendant’s probation. The enumerations of error contend that three of these grounds are not sustained by the evidence, thereby leaving unchallenged a ground which would have warranted the revocation order.

Moreover, only slight evidence is sufficient to sustain a finding revoking probation. State v. Brinson, 248 Ga. 380 (2) (283 SE2d 463). The evidence in this case authorized the imposition of the order.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman, P. J., and Carley, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Culbreath v. State, 296 S.E.2d 364, 163 Ga. App. 878, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2697 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

296 S.E.2d 364 (Culbreath v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. State
308 S.E.2d 12 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1983)