Culbertson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Culbertson v. State

234 S.W.2d 876, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2567

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 6, 1950

DocketNo. 25019

StatusPublished

This text of 234 S.W.2d 876 (Culbertson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Culbertson v. State, 234 S.W.2d 876, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2567 (Tex. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for giving a check for $108.45 to Harry Holland, in [877]*877Amarillo, such check being' drawn on a bank at White Deer, Texas, in exchange for certain articles of clothing. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for two- years.

It was shown that appellant had insufficient funds in said bank to pay such check at such time.

The defense to such action consisted of a plea of insanity, which was presented by certain witnesses, and the State countered with further witnesses. This matter was submitted to the jury by the trial court under unobjected to- instructions, and they found appellant sane at such times.

There is nothing further presented to us, and the judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted for giving a check for $108.45 to Harry Holland, in [877]*877Amarillo, such check being' drawn on a bank at White Deer, Texas, in exchange for certain articles of clothing. His punishment was assessed at confinement in the state penitentiary for two- years.

It was shown that appellant had insufficient funds in said bank to pay such check at such time.

The defense to such action consisted of a plea of insanity, which was presented by certain witnesses, and the State countered with further witnesses. This matter was submitted to the jury by the trial court under unobjected to- instructions, and they found appellant sane at such times.

There is nothing further presented to us, and the judgment will therefore be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 S.W.2d 876, 1950 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2567, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culbertson-v-state-texcrimapp-1950.