Culbertson v. Seacoast Towers East, Inc.
236 So. 2d 761, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2733
Opinion
The District Court of Appeal, Third District, certified to this Court that its decision in the instant case, reported at 232 So.2d 753 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1970),
“‘[P]asses upon a question * * * of great public interest’ in that it construes the meaning of the term ‘substantially completed’ as used in § 193.11 (4) Fla.Stat. [F.S.A.] and therefore affects the collection of taxes in this state.”
After consideration of the arguments, briefs and the record presented in this cause, we conclude that the District Court’s opinion correctly interprets the applicable law and properly construes the meaning of the term “substantially completed” in light of the facts in the case.
The writ is discharged.
It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Culbertson v. Seacoast Towers East, Inc., 236 So. 2d 761, 1970 Fla. LEXIS 2733 (Fla. 1970).
236 So. 2d 761 (Culbertson v. Seacoast Towers East, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
City National Bank of Miami v. Blake
257 So. 2d 264 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
City of Hallandale v. Chatlos
236 So. 2d 761 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)