Culberson v. Gray
This text of 27 Ga. 520 (Culberson v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court.
delivering the opinion.
If we understand this confused and imperfect record, and we are not sure that we do, the judgment below, we think, was erroneous.
It does not appear by whom the receipt was given, nor to whom it was given. It set forth the same note We will assume that it was given for the note and that Backus became possessed of it; still, judgment having been obtained upon the note, and sold by (he administrator of Palmer, Palmer’s estate being insolvent, and bought by Walker Green, without notice of the claim of Backus; what right had the Inferior Court, to which the ca. sa. bond was returnable, to try the issue tendered by Backus? None.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
27 Ga. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/culberson-v-gray-ga-1859.