Cukor v. Rothman

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Cukor v. Rothman

140 N.Y.S. 113

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedFebruary 18, 1913

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 140 N.Y.S. 113 (Cukor v. Rothman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cukor v. Rothman, 140 N.Y.S. 113 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

While the plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon a partnership contract, the breach alleged is the premature dissolution of the partnership, and the failure of the defendant to carry out his personal covenants under the agreement, and the damages claimed are amounts which the defendant personally undertook to pay. The action is therefore an action at law of which the City Court had jurisdiction.

The order is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

While the plaintiff’s cause of action is based upon a partnership contract, the breach alleged is the premature dissolution of the partnership, and the failure of the defendant to carry out his personal covenants under the agreement, and the damages claimed are amounts which the defendant personally undertook to pay. The action is therefore an action at law of which the City Court had jurisdiction.

The order is therefore reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements, and the motion denied without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 N.Y.S. 113, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cukor-v-rothman-nyappterm-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack