Cuffee v. Johnson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 24, 2009
Docket07-6886
StatusUnpublished

This text of Cuffee v. Johnson (Cuffee v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuffee v. Johnson, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6886

ROBERT A. CUFFEE,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

GENE JOHNSON, Virginia Department of Corrections Head Director; MICHAEL PHILLIPS, Food Service Director; MR., CANILO CREQUE, Food Service Manager; MRS. KIM, Kitchen Supervisor; MS. STUKES, Correction Officer; MS. WILLIAMS, Kitchen Supervisor; MS. HILL, Kitchen Supervisor; MS. GOODMAN, Kitchen Supervisor; MS. EVERETT, Kitchen Supervisor; MRS. GORE, Kitchen Supervisor; MS. BYNAM, Kitchen Supervisor; MS. THOMAS, Kitchen Supervisor; MR. WILLIAMS, Practition Nurse doctor assistance; MRS. HAMLIN, RN Head Nurse; MRS. WEBB, Kitchen Supervisor,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:07-cv-00091-RGD)

Submitted: August 20, 2009 Decided: August 24, 2009

Before WILKINSON and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert A. Cuffee, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert A. Cuffee appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaint

for failing to pay the filing fee. On appeal, we confine our

review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s Brief, see 4th

Cir. R. 34(b), and Cuffee’s brief alleges no error committed by

the district court. Accordingly, we affirm the order of the

district court. See Cuffee v. Johnson, No. 2:07-cv-00091-RGD

(E.D. Va. Apr. 30, 2009). We further deny Cuffee’s motion for

summary judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cuffee v. Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuffee-v-johnson-ca4-2009.