Cuff v. Dorland

New York Supreme Court

Cuff v. Dorland

7 Abb. N. Cas. 194

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 7 Abb. N. Cas. 194 (Cuff v. Dorland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cuff v. Dorland, 7 Abb. N. Cas. 194 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Daniels, J.

[After permitting the default to be opened on payment of costs by defendant.]—There is no reason for allowing the service of a supplemental answer. For the party succeeding to the plaintiff’s right in the case may continue to prosecute the action in his name, the same as though no change of interest had taken place (Code, § 756).

Should the costs not be paid, then the motion will be denied. But in case of payment the cause will be again restored to the calendar for trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daniels, J.

[After permitting the default to be opened on payment of costs by defendant.]—There is no reason for allowing the service of a supplemental answer. For the party succeeding to the plaintiff’s right in the case may continue to prosecute the action in his name, the same as though no change of interest had taken place (Code, § 756).

Should the costs not be paid, then the motion will be denied. But in case of payment the cause will be again restored to the calendar for trial.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

7 Abb. N. Cas. 194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuff-v-dorland-nysupct-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack