Cuevas v. Registrar of Property of Aguadilla

40 P.R. 26
Supreme Court of Puerto Rico·Decided July 23, 1929·No. No. 779·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Wole

delivered the opinion of the court.

In Medrano v. Registrar of Mayagüez, 38 P.R.R. 736 we held that it was a enrabie defect, on carving out a parcel of land, not to describe the matrix, if there have been previous segregations therefrom.

In the present case we are not clear from the record that there were any previous segregations from the matrix. However, the note of the registrar depends upon the statement that the rest of the property was not described after the segregations made. The statement apparently presupposes previous segregations and we feel hound to give the registrar the benefit of the doubt.

The note will be affirmed without prejudice to the right of appellant to ask a reconsideration if, in fact, she can show that there were no previous segregations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuevas v. Registrar of Property of Aguadilla, 40 P.R. 26 (prsupreme 1929).

40 P.R. 26 (Cuevas v. Registrar of Property of Aguadilla) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.