Cueto v. One Stop Fashion, Inc.

635 So. 2d 1087, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4526, 1994 WL 176554
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 1994·No. No. 94-717·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The Unemployment Appeals Commission correctly dismissed the appeal because it was not filed, as required, within twenty days after notice of the appeals referee’s adverse decision. § 443.151(4)(b)3, Fla.Stat. (1993); see Leon v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 476 So.2d 761 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cueto v. One Stop Fashion, Inc., 635 So. 2d 1087, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4526, 1994 WL 176554 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

635 So. 2d 1087 (Cueto v. One Stop Fashion, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Howell v. Unemployment Appeals Commission
851 So. 2d 884 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Reloba v. Westside Sanitation, Inc.
711 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)