Cueto v. Mendoza

11 So. 3d 458, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 2009 WL 1606386
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 10, 2009
DocketNo. 3D08-290
StatusPublished

This text of 11 So. 3d 458 (Cueto v. Mendoza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cueto v. Mendoza, 11 So. 3d 458, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 2009 WL 1606386 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant Marlene Cueto appeals the trial court’s Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Repeat Violence entered against her and on behalf of appellee Nelson Mendoza.

Ms. Cueto has not provided this Court with the record or a transcript from the hearing held on January 8, 2008. The burden lies with the appellant to supply the reviewing court with the record on appeal and to demonstrate reversible error. Fla. R.App. P. 9.200(e) (2007); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150, 1152 (Fla.1980). Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s Final Judgment of Injunction for Protection Against Repeat Violence.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee
377 So. 2d 1150 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 So. 3d 458, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 7257, 2009 WL 1606386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cueto-v-mendoza-fladistctapp-2009.