Cuesta v. State

970 So. 2d 394, 2007 WL 3274388
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 7, 2007·No. 3D06-1507·Published

Opinion

970 So.2d 394 (2007)

Henry CUESTA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 3D06-1507.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

November 7, 2007.

Eric Cohen, Miami, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before GERSTEN, C.J., and CORTIÑAS, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The order under review denying without an evidentiary hearing post-conviction relief from convictions for first degree murder and other offenses, asserted on the ground of ineffectiveness of trial counsel is affirmed on the basis of the extensive order entered below. See Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 323 (Fla.2007); Teffeteller v. Dugger, 734 So.2d 1009, 1023 (Fla. 1999).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cuesta v. State, 970 So. 2d 394, 2007 WL 3274388 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

970 So. 2d 394 (Cuesta v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carratelli v. State
961 So. 2d 312 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2007)
Teffeteller v. Dugger
734 So. 2d 1009 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1999)
Muram v. State
970 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)