Cuesta v. State
This text of 970 So. 2d 394 (Cuesta v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Henry CUESTA, Appellant,
v.
The STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Eric Cohen, Miami, for appellant.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Before GERSTEN, C.J., and CORTIÑAS, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The order under review denying without an evidentiary hearing post-conviction relief from convictions for first degree murder and other offenses, asserted on the ground of ineffectiveness of trial counsel is affirmed on the basis of the extensive order entered below. See Carratelli v. State, 961 So.2d 312, 323 (Fla.2007); Teffeteller v. Dugger, 734 So.2d 1009, 1023 (Fla. 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
970 So. 2d 394, 2007 WL 3274388, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuesta-v-state-fladistctapp-2007.