Cuellar v. Gonzales
This text of 170 F. App'x 23 (Cuellar v. Gonzales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Respondent’s motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(1)(B); Lopez-Umanzor v. Gonzales, 405 F.3d 1049, 1053 n. 3 (9th Cir.2005) (noting that presentation of false testimony precludes a finding of good moral character for purposes of cancellation eligibility).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 F. App'x 23, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuellar-v-gonzales-ca9-2006.