Cuebas v. Smith

24 A.D.3d 200, 804 N.Y.S.2d 684
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 8, 2005
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 24 A.D.3d 200 (Cuebas v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuebas v. Smith, 24 A.D.3d 200, 804 N.Y.S.2d 684 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

Appeal, from order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Norma Ruiz, J.), entered on or about March 6, 2002, which, upon defendant’s motion denominated one to renew and reargue a prior order of the same court (George Friedman, J.), entered July 30, 2001, which had granted [201]*201plaintiffs’ motion for a default judgment for failure of defendant to timely appear, treated the renewal/reargument motion as being solely for reargument and denied the motion, unanimously dismissed, without costs.

The court properly treated the motion as one for reargument only, and the court’s denial of such motion is nonappealable (CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [viii]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

D&A Construction, Inc. v. New York City Housing Authority
105 A.D.3d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Morris Heights Health Center, Inc. v. DellaPietra
38 A.D.3d 261 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 A.D.3d 200, 804 N.Y.S.2d 684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuebas-v-smith-nyappdiv-2005.