Cuebas v. Buffalo Motor Lodge/Best Value Inn

55 A.D.3d 1361, 865 N.Y.S.2d 184
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 3, 2008
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 55 A.D.3d 1361 (Cuebas v. Buffalo Motor Lodge/Best Value Inn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuebas v. Buffalo Motor Lodge/Best Value Inn, 55 A.D.3d 1361, 865 N.Y.S.2d 184 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Rose H. Sconiers, J.), entered September 14, 2007 in a personal injury action. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Plaintiff commenced this action, individually and on behalf of her daughter, seeking damages for injuries [1362]*1362sustained by her daughter when she tripped and fell on a sidewalk leading to the door of defendant’s premises. According to plaintiff, her daughter caught her foot between sidewalk slabs with a height differential of approximately one inch, which caused her to fall forward into a glass window adjacent to the door. Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. “Whether a particular height difference between sidewalk slabs constitutes a dangerous or defective condition depends on the peculiar facts and circumstances of each case, including the width, depth, elevation, irregularity, and appearance of the defect as well as the time, place, and circumstances of the injury” (Tesak v Marine Midland Bank, 254 AD2d 717, 717-718 [1998]; see generally Trincere v County of Suffolk, 90 NY2d 976, 977-978 [1997]). Based on the record before us, we conclude that defendant failed to meet its burden of establishing as a matter of law that the alleged defect “was too trivial to constitute a dangerous or defective condition” (Schaaf v Pork Chop, Inc., 24 AD3d 1277, 1278 [2005]; see Stewart v 7-Eleven, Inc., 302 AD2d 881 [2003]; McKenzie v Crossroads Arena, 291 AD2d 860, 861 [2002], lv dismissed 98 NY2d 647 [2002]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt, Martoche, Smith and Lunn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amos v. School 16 Assoc., L.P.
2020 NY Slip Op 07764 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Beagle v. City of Buffalo
2019 NY Slip Op 9126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
GRECO, ANNA v. CITY OF BUFFALO
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
Greco v. City of Buffalo
128 A.D.3d 1461 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
MCFADDEN, ELLIOTT C. v. NEW CASTLE HOTEL, LLC
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
McFadden v. New Castle Hotel, LLC
101 A.D.3d 1767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
GAFTER, ESTELLE v. BUFFALO MEDICAL GROUP, P.C.
85 A.D.3d 1605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Tully v. Anderson's Frozen Custard, Inc.
77 A.D.3d 1474 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Brancaccio v. Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
67 A.D.3d 618 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
55 A.D.3d 1361, 865 N.Y.S.2d 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuebas-v-buffalo-motor-lodgebest-value-inn-nyappdiv-2008.