Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.

36 Cal. App. 818
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedApril 13, 1918
DocketCiv. No. 2154
StatusPublished

This text of 36 Cal. App. 818 (Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cudahy Packing Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co., 36 Cal. App. 818 (Cal. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

KERRIGAN, J.

The questions involved in this appeal are in all respects similar to those presented in Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co. (No. 2104), ante, p. 773, [173 Pac. 404], and upon the authority of that ease the judgment is reversed.

Zook, J., pro tern., and Beasly, J., pro tern., concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on May 13, 1918, and a petition to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on June 10, 1918.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Armour & Co. v. R. Rosenberg & Sons Co.
173 P. 404 (California Court of Appeal, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 Cal. App. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cudahy-packing-co-v-r-rosenberg-sons-co-calctapp-1918.