Cudahy Packing Co. v. Longo

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Cudahy Packing Co. v. Longo

128 So. 208, 13 La. App. 64, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 607

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedApril 19, 1930

DocketNo. 13,299

StatusPublished

This text of 128 So. 208 (Cudahy Packing Co. v. Longo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cudahy Packing Co. v. Longo, 128 So. 208, 13 La. App. 64, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 607 (La. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit by a meat packer against a butcher on an open account in the sum of $275.22. The question presented is whether credit was extended to the defendant, Stephen Longo, or to a party by the name of Jones, a tenant of Longo, who was in actual charge of the butcher shop. The lower court held that Longo was responsible for1 the amount, and, from a consideration of the evidence in the transcript, we are unable to say that this finding was erroneous.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WESTERFIELD, J.

This is a suit by a meat packer against a butcher on an open account in the sum of $275.22. The question presented is whether credit was extended to the defendant, Stephen Longo, or to a party by the name of Jones, a tenant of Longo, who was in actual charge of the butcher shop. The lower court held that Longo was responsible for1 the amount, and, from a consideration of the evidence in the transcript, we are unable to say that this finding was erroneous.

For the reasons assigned, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 208, 13 La. App. 64, 1930 La. App. LEXIS 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cudahy-packing-co-v-longo-lactapp-1930.