Cuda v. Utica Mutual Insurance
This text of 91 A.D.2d 1166 (Cuda v. Utica Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Order affirmed, with costs to plaintiff, for the reasons stated in the memorandum decision at Special Term, Murphy, J. As to plaintiff’s cross appeal, we note that the interest penalty provided for in subdivision 1 of section 675 of the Insurance Law may not be assessed against other than the insurer. All concur, Simons, J., not participating. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Murphy, J. — attorney’s fee.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Simons, Doerr, Boomer and Moule, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 A.D.2d 1166, 459 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuda-v-utica-mutual-insurance-nyappdiv-1983.