Cuciniello v. Ratledge

Fourth Circuit

Cuciniello v. Ratledge

624 F. App'x 108

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2015·No. No. 15-7054·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Cuciniello, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)' petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Joseph Cuciniello, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012)' petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pau-peris, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cuciniello v. Ratledge, No. 5:15-hc-02008-FL (E.D.N.C. June 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cuciniello v. Ratledge, 624 F. App'x 108 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

624 F. App'x 108 (Cuciniello v. Ratledge) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related