Cubilete v. State

659 So. 2d 482, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9014, 1995 WL 502165
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 25, 1995·No. No. 94-02250·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alexander D. Cubilete appeals his conviction and sentence for grand theft. We affirm the conviction but strike certain probation conditions and costs that were not properly imposed.

Because they were not pronounced at sentencing, we strike the special conditions found in probation conditions four and seven. See Hamilton v. State, 658 So.2d 1068 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We strike $2 in court costs imposed pursuant to section 948.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), because this cost is discretionary but was not orally announced at sentencing; we also strike $215 for the court improvement fund. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc).

Convictions affirmed; certain probation conditions and costs stricken.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PARKER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cubilete v. State, 659 So. 2d 482, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 9014, 1995 WL 502165 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

659 So. 2d 482 (Cubilete v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dyals v. Hodges
659 So. 2d 482 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)