Cubberly v. Shearer

Indiana Supreme Court

Cubberly v. Shearer

20 Ind. 237

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedMay 15, 1863

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Ind. 237 (Cubberly v. Shearer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cubberly v. Shearer, 20 Ind. 237 (Ind. 1863).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Action by the appellee against the appellants, upon a promissory note. Judgment for the plaintiff.

There is no error pointed out in the brief of counsel for the appellants. The defendants below filed an answer of several paragraphs, to which demurrers were sustained. The Counsel simply say, “the Court below erred in sustaining said / demurrers, for which the judgment ought to be reversed.” We shall not range through the record in search of the supposed errors. Vide Bray v. Carpenter, at the present term, [supra]

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs, and 2 percent, damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Action by the appellee against the appellants, upon a promissory note. Judgment for the plaintiff.

There is no error pointed out in the brief of counsel for the appellants. The defendants below filed an answer of several paragraphs, to which demurrers were sustained. The Counsel simply say, “the Court below erred in sustaining said / demurrers, for which the judgment ought to be reversed.” We shall not range through the record in search of the supposed errors. Vide Bray v. Carpenter, at the present term, [supra]

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs, and 2 percent, damages.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Ind. 237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cubberly-v-shearer-ind-1863.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack