Cubacub v. Department of the Navy

230 Ct. Cl. 908, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 198, 1982 WL 25269
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedApril 16, 1982
DocketApp. No. 59-81
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 230 Ct. Cl. 908 (Cubacub v. Department of the Navy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cubacub v. Department of the Navy, 230 Ct. Cl. 908, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 198, 1982 WL 25269 (cc 1982).

Opinion

This is an appeal from a decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board (mspb) holding petitioner is not entitled to retirement benefits under the Civil Service Retirement System (csrs), 5 U.S.C. §8331 (1976) et seq. Respondent has moved for summary judgment. After careful consideration of the parties’ submissions and without oral argument, we affirm the decision of the mspb .

Petitioner, a citizen of the Republic of the Philippines, was a civilian employee of the United States Department of the Navy for over 21 years. The mspb found, and a review of the record clearly demonstrates, that petitioner’s appointment was at all times specifically excluded from csrs coverage. Petitioner therefore does not meet the requirement of 5 U.S.C. §8333(a) that he have completed 5 years of creditable service to qualify for benefits under csrs. Guevara v. United States, 229 Ct. Cl 595 (1981).

Petitioner argues that his appointment must qualify him for csrs benefits because he worked for the Navy for 21 years. Due to the length of his appointment, he contends his [909]*909appointment was not properly classified "Excepted Appointment - Indefinite.” There is simply no support for petitioner’s position. Petitioner also claims, without documentary support, that others in excepted, indefinite appointments have received csrs benefits. This does not present a triable issue of fact. Those individuals may well have held positions qualifying them for csrs benefits prior to their retirement from an excepted position.

it is therefore ordered that the decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board be and is hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Juanita A. Rosete v. Office of Personnel Management
48 F.3d 514 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
Aurora M. Guiang v. Office of Personnel Management
907 F.2d 159 (Federal Circuit, 1990)
Cirilo C. Camasosa v. Office of Personnel Management
852 F.2d 1292 (Federal Circuit, 1988)
Alvarez v. United States
9 Cl. Ct. 311 (Court of Claims, 1985)
Caiyod v. Department of the Navy
231 Ct. Cl. 1004 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Guzman v. Department of the Navy
231 Ct. Cl. 1005 (Court of Claims, 1982)
Menchavez v. Office of Personnel Management
231 Ct. Cl. 924 (Court of Claims, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 Ct. Cl. 908, 1982 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 198, 1982 WL 25269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cubacub-v-department-of-the-navy-cc-1982.