Cuba v. Turmelie
This text of 168 Misc. 256 (Cuba v. Turmelie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the decision of the Court of Appeals in Psota v. R. R. Co. (246 N. Y. 388), the statute relied on (Vehicle and Traffic Law, § 59) was held not to affect the liability of an employer for the negligence of his driver. That liability was held to depend on common-law principles. Hence, in the present case, in the absence of proof of authority to the driver to carry invited passengers, defendant cannot be held liable.
Judgment so far as appealed from reversed, with costs, and complaint as against defendant-appellant dismissed on the merits, with costs.
All concur. Present — Lydon, Frankenthaler and Noonan, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 Misc. 256, 5 N.Y.S.2d 811, 1938 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1741, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuba-v-turmelie-nyappterm-1938.