Cuba v. State

102 S.E. 830, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 706
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 14, 1920
Docket11237
StatusPublished

This text of 102 S.E. 830 (Cuba v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuba v. State, 102 S.E. 830, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 706 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

1. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial in which it was contended ¡that the defendant’s right of cross-examination was unduly restricted by the court.

2. The court did not err in charging the jury- on the law as to shooting at another.

3. The evidence authorized the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Luke, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.E. 830, 25 Ga. App. 239, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 706, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuba-v-state-gactapp-1920.