Cuatotolapam Sugar Co. v. Beck
175 A.D. 985
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 15, 1916
StatusPublished
This text of 175 A.D. 985 (Cuatotolapam Sugar Co. v. Beck) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Cuatotolapam Sugar Co. v. Beck, 175 A.D. 985 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).
Opinion
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs; time to answer extended. Present— Clarke, P. J., Laughlin, Dowling, Smith and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
175 A.D. 985, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuatotolapam-sugar-co-v-beck-nyappdiv-1916.