Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

912 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2005 WL 2756079
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 26, 2005
DocketNo. 1D05-4209
StatusPublished

This text of 912 So. 2d 1250 (Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 912 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2005 WL 2756079 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to our order of September 1, 2005, we conclude that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“ ‘[failure to file any notice within the 30-day period constitutes an irremediable jurisdictional defect’ ”) (quoting from First Nat’l Bank in Fort Myers v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 461 So.2d 208, 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Natl. Bk v. Fla. Unemp. Appeals
461 So. 2d 208 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)
Miami-Dade County v. Peart
843 So. 2d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
912 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2005 WL 2756079, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuartas-v-florida-unemployment-appeals-commission-fladistctapp-2005.