Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

912 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2005 WL 2756079

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 26, 2005·No. No. 1D05-4209·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to our order of September 1, 2005, we conclude that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“ ‘[failure to file any notice within the 30-day period constitutes an irremediable jurisdictional defect’ ”) (quoting from First Nat’l Bank in Fort Myers v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 461 So.2d 208, 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Having considered appellant’s response to our order of September 1, 2005, we conclude that the notice of appeal was not timely filed. Accordingly, we must dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See generally Miami-Dade County v. Peart, 843 So.2d 363, 364 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003) (“ ‘[failure to file any notice within the 30-day period constitutes an irremediable jurisdictional defect’ ”) (quoting from First Nat’l Bank in Fort Myers v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 461 So.2d 208, 208 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)).

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ALLEN, WEBSTER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 912 So. 2d 1250, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 16866, 2005 WL 2756079 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

912 So. 2d 1250 (Cuartas v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related