Cuadrado v. Goord
This text of 253 A.D.2d 951 (Cuadrado v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner was found guilty of violating the prison disciplinary rules which prohibit assaulting an inmate and possessing [952]*952unauthorized organizational materials. Respondent concedes, and our review of the record confirms, that procedural infirmities pertaining to the charge of assault on an inmate require that we annul that part of the determination.
We reach a different conclusion, however, on the charge of unauthorized possession of organizational materials. Included in the material confiscated from petitioner’s cell was a document labeled “POW MINC” which made references to “recruiting some loyal trusting soldiers that will represent with no hesitation” and purchasing “uzi[s]”, shotguns and other weapons. Furthermore, a drawing entitled La Familia depicted individuals with firearms standing over a grave. This evidence together with the misbehavior report provide substantial evidence to support the determination of petitioner’s guilt (see, Matter of Rivera v Coombe, 231 AD2d 790, 791).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 A.D.2d 951, 679 N.Y.S.2d 160, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cuadrado-v-goord-nyappdiv-1998.