Cuadra v. George Brown Sports Club-Palm, Inc.

Opinion

) Case No. 1:17-CV-01063 DAD EPG MARIO CUADRA, ) ) JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER Plaintiff, ) FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ) v. ) (ECF No. 136) ) GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB- ) PALM, INC.; GEORGE BROWN SPORTS ) CLUB, INC; JOHNSTON ) CONTRACTING, INC.; and DOES 1 ) THROUGH 100, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ACTIONS. )

The parties to this action, acting through counsel, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) hereby stipulate, in consideration of a negotiated settlement executed by them, to the Dismissal With Prejudice of this action, including all claims and counterclaims stated herein against all parties, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. // // // Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Steven S. Dias STEVEN S. DIAS Attorney for Plaintiff, Mario Cuadra

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Anthony N. DeMaria ANTHONY N. DeMARIA Attorney for Defendants, Third Party Plaintiff, Cross-Claim Plaintiff, GEORGE BROWN SPORTS CLUB PALM LLC, et al.

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ T. Patrick Long T. PATRICK LONG or WARREN B. CAMPBELL Attorney for Defendant/Cross Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, JOHNSTON CONTRACTING, INC.

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Kathleen C. Miller PATRICK K. O’BRIEN or KATHLEEN C. MILLER or BATKHAND ZOLJARGAL Attorney for Third Party Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff/ KENNETH GLEN CLARK dba CLARK

Dated: May 8, 2020 By: /S/ Alice Chen Smith Attorney for Third Party Plaintiff/ Third Party Defendant Defendant/Cross Defendant, WCM, INC. dba TEC SPEC, INC. 4:68 UV VEAL SOM PO ee OY VI

The parties have filed a stipulation to dismiss the entire action with prejudice (ECF No. 136). In light of the stipulation, the case has ended and is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to close this case. ITIS SO ORDERED. Dated: _ May 8, 2020 [Jee ey —— UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE