CTI III, LLC v. Devine

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMay 18, 2023
Docket2:21-cv-02184
StatusUnknown

This text of CTI III, LLC v. Devine (CTI III, LLC v. Devine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
CTI III, LLC v. Devine, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 Kurt A. Kappes (SBN 146384) Todd Pickles (SBN 215629) 2 Madeline Orlando (SBN 337460) GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP 3 400 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400 Sacramento, California 95814 4 Telephone: 916.442.1111 Facsimile: 916.448.1709 5 kappesk@gtlaw.com picklest@gtlaw.com 6 orlandom@gtlaw.com

7 Attorneys for Defendant TRI-MERIT, LLC 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13

14 CTI III, LLC, No. 2:21-cv-2184 JAM DB

15 Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR LITIGATION INVOLVING PATENTS, 16 v. HIGHLY SENSITIVE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND/OR TRADE SECRETS 17 BARRY DEVINE, an individual; TRI-MERIT, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company; and 18 DOES 1 through 50,

19 Defendants.

20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of confidential, 3 proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for 4 any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. This confidential, proprietary, or 5 private information may include financial records, contracts, marketing materials, client information, price 6 information, strategic planning and forecasting, and confidential employee information and other 7 information. This information should be protected by a court order as this instant action concerns the 8 alleged misuse of the abovementioned information and without this Order in place both plaintiff and 9 defendants are subject to injury. 10 Accordingly, the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated 11 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 12 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use 13 extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 14 applicable legal principles. Nonetheless, the parties do agree that any and all discovery produced by any 15 party, including disclosures, responses, or documents, information, or evidence produced, shall be used 16 solely for purposes of this litigation, including the potential settlement thereof, and for no other purpose. 17 The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 14.4, below, that this Stipulated Protective 18 Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; the parties agree to follow the 19 applicable procedures set forth both the Local Rules and controlling law when a party seeks permission 20 from the court to file material under seal. 21 2. DEFINITIONS 22 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or 23 items under this Order. 24 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, 25 stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 26(c). 27 2.3 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). 1 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it produces 2 in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – 3 ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE”. 4 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or 5 manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 6 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in 7 this matter. 8 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the 9 litigation who (1) has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant 10 in this action, (2) is not a past or current employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor, and (3) at the time 11 of retention, is not anticipated to become an employee of a Party or of a Party’s competitor. 12 2.8 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” Information or Items: 13 extremely sensitive “Confidential Information or Items,” disclosure of which to another Party or Non-Party 14 would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive means. 15 2.9 “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE” Information or Items: extremely 16 sensitive “Confidential Information or Items” representing computer code and associated comments and 17 revision histories, formulas, engineering specifications, or schematics that define or otherwise describe in 18 detail the algorithms or structure of software or hardware designs, disclosure of which to another Party or 19 Non-Party would create a substantial risk of serious harm that could not be avoided by less restrictive 20 means. 21 2.10 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House Counsel does 22 not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 23 2.11 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity 24 not named as a Party to this action. 25 /// 26 /// 27 2.12 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action but 1 party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 2 2.13 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, consultants, 3 retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 4 2.14 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in 5 this action. 6 2.15 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., 7 photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or 8 retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 9 2.16 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 10 “CONFIDENTIAL,” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” or as “HIGHLY 11 CONFIDENTIAL – SOURCE CODE.” 12 2.17 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a Producing 13 Party. 14 3. SCOPE 15 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 16 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, 17 excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or 18 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. However, the protections 19 conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following information: (a) any information that is 20 in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving Party or becomes part of the public domain 21 after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of publication not involving a violation of this Order, 22 including becoming part of the public record through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to 23 the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a 24 source who obtained the information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating 25 Party. Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 26 4. DURATION 27 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this Order 1 directs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
CTI III, LLC v. Devine, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cti-iii-llc-v-devine-caed-2023.