Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. v. Forman, C.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 30, 2016·No. 132 EM 2016·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN DISTRICT

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS OF : No. 132 EM 2016 PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, : : Respondent : : : v. : : : CHRISTOPHER FORMAN, : : Petitioner :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 30th day of September, 2016, the Application for Leave to File

Original Process and the Petition for Writ of Mandamus are DISMISSED. See

Commonwealth v. Ali, 10 A.3d 282 (Pa. 2010) (providing that hybrid representation is

impermissible).

The Prothonotary is DIRECTED to forward these filings to counsel of record.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. v. Forman, C., (Pa. 2016).

Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. v. Forman, C. (Ct. Com. Pl., Phila. v. Forman, C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Ali
10 A.3d 282 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2010)