CSX Transp., Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd.

D.C. Circuit

CSX Transp., Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd.

568 F.3d 236

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2009

Docket07-1369

StatusPublished

This text of 568 F.3d 236 (CSX Transp., Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

CSX Transp., Inc. v. Surface Transp. Bd., 568 F.3d 236 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals F OR T HE D ISTRICT OF C OLUMBIA C IRCUIT ____________

No. 07-1369 September Term 2009 STB-ExParte646 Filed On: October 23, 2009 CSX Transportation, Inc., Petitioner v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Respondents ------------------------------ American Chemistry Council, et al., Intervenors ------------------------------ Consolidated with 07-1370, 07-1371, 07-1372, 07-1410, 08-1194

BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Griffith, Circuit Judges

ORDER Upon consideration of the petition of Norfolk Southern Railway Company for panel rehearing filed on July 24, 2009, and the response thereto, it is ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be granted and the opinion filed June 9, 2009, be amended as set forth in the opinion issued this date. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued June 9, 2009, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to enter a new judgment. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate seven days after the issuance of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 41; D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Michael C. McGrail Deputy Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States Court of Appeals F OR T HE D ISTRICT OF C OLUMBIA C IRCUIT ____________

No. 07-1369 September Term 2009 STB-ExParte646 Filed On: October 23, 2009 CSX Transportation, Inc., Petitioner v. Surface Transportation Board and United States of America, Respondents ------------------------------ American Chemistry Council, et al., Intervenors ------------------------------ Consolidated with 07-1370, 07-1371, 07-1372, 07-1410, 08-1194

BEFORE: Rogers, Tatel, and Griffith, Circuit Judges

ORDER Upon consideration of the petition of Norfolk Southern Railway Company for panel rehearing filed on July 24, 2009, and the response thereto, it is ORDERED that the petition for rehearing be granted and the opinion filed June 9, 2009, be amended as set forth in the opinion issued this date. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the judgment of the court issued June 9, 2009, be vacated. The Clerk is directed to enter a new judgment. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate seven days after the issuance of this order. See Fed. R. App. P. 41; D.C. Cir. Rule 41.

Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: /s/ Michael C. McGrail Deputy Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

568 F.3d 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/csx-transp-inc-v-surface-transp-bd-cadc-2009.