CSSEL Bare Trust v. Phoenix Life Insurance

66 A.D.2d 495, 885 N.Y.S.2d 901

Opinion

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marcy S. Friedman, J), entered March 17, 2009, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay the action to the extent of staying the action pending determination in a federal action entitled Kramer v Lockwood Pension Servs., Inc. (US Dist Ct, SD NY, 08 CV 2429, Batts, J., 2008) of defendant’s sixth defense of no insurable interest, unanimously dismissed as moot, without costs.

Inasmuch as the District Court issued its decision in the federal action on September 1, 2009 (653 F Supp 2d 354 [SD NY 2009]), the issue raised on this appeal, whether the motion court abused its discretion in granting a discretionary stay (CPLR 2201), has been rendered moot. Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [See 2009 NY Slip Op 30569(U).]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CSSEL Bare Trust v. Phoenix Life Insurance, 66 A.D.2d 495, 885 N.Y.S.2d 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

66 A.D.2d 495 (CSSEL Bare Trust v. Phoenix Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kramer v. LOCKWOOD PENSION SERVICES, INC.
653 F. Supp. 2d 354 (S.D. New York, 2009)