Csp Technologies, Inc. v. Sud-Chemie Ag
This text of Csp Technologies, Inc. v. Sud-Chemie Ag (Csp Technologies, Inc. v. Sud-Chemie Ag) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 14-1337 Document: 30 Page: 1 Filed: 10/06/2014
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SUD-CHEMIE AG, SUD-CHEMIE, INC., AIRSEC S.A.S., CLARIANT PRODUKTE DEUTSCHLAND GMBH, CLARIANT CORPORATION, AND CLARIANT PRODUCTION (FRANCE) S.A.S., Defendants-Appellees. ______________________
2014-1337 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana in No. 4:11-cv-00029-RLY- WGH, Judge Richard L. Young. ______________________
ON MOTION ______________________ Before PROST, Chief Judge, DYK and MOORE, Circuit Judges. PROST, Chief Judge. ORDER Appellees move without opposition to dismiss this ap- peal as premature. Case: 14-1337 Document: 30 Page: 2 Filed: 10/06/2014
As appellees note, counterclaims for invalidity and pa- tent misuse are unresolved and remain outstanding. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT: (1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed. (2) Each party shall bear its own costs. FOR THE COURT
/s/ Daniel E. O’Toole Daniel E. O’Toole Clerk of Court
ISSUED AS A MANDATE: October 6, 2014
s30
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Csp Technologies, Inc. v. Sud-Chemie Ag, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/csp-technologies-inc-v-sud-chemie-ag-cafc-2014.