C.S.P., Inc. A/K/A Coordinated Services Plus, Inc. v. Mary Maxine Pennington, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Patrick John Pennington, Sr., and as Next Friend of Alan Mitchell Pennington, a Minor Child, Patrick John Pennington, Jr. and Raymond Ronald Pennington, Individually and as Heirs
This text of C.S.P., Inc. A/K/A Coordinated Services Plus, Inc. v. Mary Maxine Pennington, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Patrick John Pennington, Sr., and as Next Friend of Alan Mitchell Pennington, a Minor Child, Patrick John Pennington, Jr. and Raymond Ronald Pennington, Individually and as Heirs (C.S.P., Inc. A/K/A Coordinated Services Plus, Inc. v. Mary Maxine Pennington, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Patrick John Pennington, Sr., and as Next Friend of Alan Mitchell Pennington, a Minor Child, Patrick John Pennington, Jr. and Raymond Ronald Pennington, Individually and as Heirs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed November 6, 2003.
In The
Fourteenth Court of Appeals
____________
NO. 14-03-00220-CV
C.S.P., INC. a/k/a COORDINATED SERVICES PLUS, INC., Appellant
V.
MARY MAXINE PENNINGTON, Individullay an as Heir to the Estate of PATRICK JOHN PENNINGTON, SR., Deceased, and as next friend of ALAN MITCHELL PENNINGTON, a minor child, PATRICK JOHN PENNINGTON, JR., and RAYMOND RONALD PENNINGTON, Individually and as Heirs to the Estate of PATRICK JOHN PENNINGTON, SR., Deceased, Appellees
On Appeal from the 400th District Court
Fort Bend County, Texas
Trial Court Cause No. 109,347
M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N
This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 6, 2003. On April 24, 2003, this Court ordered the parties to mediation. Although the parties initially reached a tentative settlement, they were unable to finally resolve their dispute. On October 24, 2003, appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal because it no longer desires to pursue the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. The motion is granted.
Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.
PER CURIAM
Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed November 6, 2003.
Panel consists of Chief Justice Brister and Justices Anderson and Seymore.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
C.S.P., Inc. A/K/A Coordinated Services Plus, Inc. v. Mary Maxine Pennington, Individually and as Heir to the Estate of Patrick John Pennington, Sr., and as Next Friend of Alan Mitchell Pennington, a Minor Child, Patrick John Pennington, Jr. and Raymond Ronald Pennington, Individually and as Heirs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/csp-inc-aka-coordinated-services-plus-inc-v-mary-maxine-texapp-2003.